A note above, for a change. Thanks to Pamela, who suggested the topic for this blog.
Last week marked an incredible discovery. Scientists all around the world bowed down before an Iranian cleric. Yes, the cleric has discovered something that scientists have toiled so many years for. It was an absolute outside-the-box thought. Scientists would have never reached that point anytime soon. On the first read itself, his proposed idea seemed fascinating and would certainly solve all mysteries behind the unpredictable earthquakes. Only that we lose all the fun. Who wants fun? Earthquakes are indeed disastrous.
A close look at his theory. He predicts that only promiscuous women are responsible for earthquakes. And the reason he unveiled was even more interesting. Men lack self-control under the influence of such women. If it was that easy, how many women are needed to take control of his President and his nuclear ambitions? Iranian cleric and women. Never go hand-in-hand. Not in public. Undeniably, the cleric has spent much time researching women, needless to mention promiscuous.
Not surprisingly, this theory attracted supporters from India. Of course, clergymen. Who else would? Of 1.2 billion, we do have substantial insanity in the form of clergies. One of them defended the cleric by giving a new perspective to his theory. By earthquake, it seems, the Iranian cleric meant social earthquake. The aftershocks have now been shifted to society. Where the hell is 'social earth' on this damn earth? When does it quake? I hope the Pope will clarify this soon after the pedophile cases.
Women, all around the world, did rise to the moment, rather insanely. A Facebook campaign asked women to dress promiscuously on April 26th. Demanded an explanation of his theory from the cleric. Having proven to be unpredictable, what if there was an earthquake? Women should have given up their outlook. Luckily it didn't happen.
Indian women are no bystanders to this. Scrupulous reactions and support for the genuine cause everywhere.
"I will definitely wear such a [promiscuous] t-shirt tomorrow to show my support" and "I don't know how effective it will be but why not do it anyway for the fun of it all?"
My response and request to them.
Are you 'supported' in such a t-shirt first of all? Please take a look at not-so-long-ago-'Swami' Nithyanandha. A notorious victim of a 'promiscuous' fun. Social quake-hit victim.
Please do not create more earthquakes. Earthquakes are not fun ;-)
Last week marked an incredible discovery. Scientists all around the world bowed down before an Iranian cleric. Yes, the cleric has discovered something that scientists have toiled so many years for. It was an absolute outside-the-box thought. Scientists would have never reached that point anytime soon. On the first read itself, his proposed idea seemed fascinating and would certainly solve all mysteries behind the unpredictable earthquakes. Only that we lose all the fun. Who wants fun? Earthquakes are indeed disastrous.
A close look at his theory. He predicts that only promiscuous women are responsible for earthquakes. And the reason he unveiled was even more interesting. Men lack self-control under the influence of such women. If it was that easy, how many women are needed to take control of his President and his nuclear ambitions? Iranian cleric and women. Never go hand-in-hand. Not in public. Undeniably, the cleric has spent much time researching women, needless to mention promiscuous.
Not surprisingly, this theory attracted supporters from India. Of course, clergymen. Who else would? Of 1.2 billion, we do have substantial insanity in the form of clergies. One of them defended the cleric by giving a new perspective to his theory. By earthquake, it seems, the Iranian cleric meant social earthquake. The aftershocks have now been shifted to society. Where the hell is 'social earth' on this damn earth? When does it quake? I hope the Pope will clarify this soon after the pedophile cases.
Women, all around the world, did rise to the moment, rather insanely. A Facebook campaign asked women to dress promiscuously on April 26th. Demanded an explanation of his theory from the cleric. Having proven to be unpredictable, what if there was an earthquake? Women should have given up their outlook. Luckily it didn't happen.
Indian women are no bystanders to this. Scrupulous reactions and support for the genuine cause everywhere.
"I will definitely wear such a [promiscuous] t-shirt tomorrow to show my support" and "I don't know how effective it will be but why not do it anyway for the fun of it all?"
My response and request to them.
Are you 'supported' in such a t-shirt first of all? Please take a look at not-so-long-ago-'Swami' Nithyanandha. A notorious victim of a 'promiscuous' fun. Social quake-hit victim.
Please do not create more earthquakes. Earthquakes are not fun ;-)
1 comment:
What happens to clans who live in forest? What happens to these men who still follow monogamy inspite of any attire (or no attire) among anyone?
Is it really someone wearing something (or not) can make somebody lose his/her control? Is it not an excuse rather a reason?
Post a Comment